Perpetual Motion Machines
Also see:
What they are
My high school chemistry teacher told us there are three laws of
thermodynamics: you can't get something for nothing, you can't win,
and you have to lose. The first law says you can't produce matter or
energy from nothing; they are conserved. The second says the amount of
entropy in the universe can only increase. The third notes that
friction exists, so entropy does increase. (Note from 20 years later:
that's not what the third law says at all.)
Perpetual motion machines are machines that are supposed to disobey
one of the laws of thermodynamics. Usually it's the second law that
people want to break, reversing the flow of entropy. Entropy is the
amount of disorder in the universe. (Some claim to violate the first
law, they create energy from nothing. I don't consider those here.)
Why you can't design perpetual motion machines
The second law of thermodynamics isn't actually an axiom. It can be
deduced from the other laws of physics. It's an application of the
pigeonhole principle.
- The known laws of nature are reversible, that is, given a current
state the previous state is uniquely determined.
- Which implies that if you start with n possible states, after any
amount of time you'll still have n possible states.
- For every state that looks like something other than heat, there
are a zillion states that look like heat.
- Therefore any process will map at most one in a zillion heat
states to something that looks like work. And only at the expense of
mapping an equal number of work states to heat states. Almost all of
the time heat stays heat. You can't map all the heat states to work
states, they just won't fit.
I saw a published proof of the second law once that was based on
quantum mechanics. Instead of arguing about n states, it represented
the set of possible states as a volume in 6-dimensional space (3 for
space, 3 for velocity), and showed that the volume stayed constant
over time. (Um, it seems to me like that published proof covers the
continuous space, while my outline of a proof was more quantum, but
what do I know.)
This still allows perpetual motion machines to be built -- just not
designed. If you succeed in building one you're guaranteed to be
unable to explain it using the known laws of physics.
recycling works
But wait. Anyone using a perpetual motion machine would want to
do something with the work after it's been extracted from heat. If
you consider such a system as a whole, work maps to heat maps to
work. The number of possible states does not decrease.
This suggests it is possible to make a machine that continually
does useful work without requiring outside energy. The key is to
always know what state you are in, and to make sure useful states
always map to useful states. An example of such a machine is a
quantum
computer.
maximum universal entropy
The universe is a closed system, and entropy keeps increasing,
so it will eventually reach maximum entropy and stay there, right?
Wrong. It's a continuously expanding system, and the maximum
entropy possible keeps increasing as the volume of the universe
increases. The universe will never reach maximum entropy because the
goalposts keep moving. Wheee! It's why the night sky is dark. This
means the universe won't wind down to a constant nonzero
temperature, but will continuously approach absolute zero instead.
This strikes me as an improvement over heat death, but not much of
one.
How to figure out why a particular design won't
work
Usually a perpetual motion machine can be used to light a
lightbulb. Put it in a closed system that continuously lights a
lightbulb. The machine has to convert the heat and light generated
into electricity to continue running the lightbulb.
Usually there is a second machine that looks just like the first
machine running in reverse. Usually you get it by stopping all the
particles and sending them in reverse. And usually this second
machine should be a perpetual motion machine for the same reasons as
the first machine.
This second machine is a perpetual motion machine, but
for a very strange reason. The lightbulb continuously absorbs heat
and light, converting it into electricity. And (here's the important
part), the machine keeps converting electricity into heat and light.
Is that what is supposed to happen? No? Well, figure out how it is
happening and you've figured out why the original perpetual motion
machine won't work.
Some perpetual motion machine designs
Why won't these work? (I'm including the solutions. Tell me if
you don't want to see the solutions. I think the solutions are more
interesting than the designs themselves.)
-
Catalyzing an endothermic chemical reation.
Suppose you have a reaction AB+heat <-> A+B which favors A+B.
Such reactions do exist -- for example salt dissolving in water. Find
a catalyst for this reaction. It reduces entropy, so the catalyst
favors AB+heat. When AB+heat is released out
into solution, it decays back into A+B, absorbing heat. You've got
heat released at the catalyst and absorbed in the rest of the
solution. Run a thermocouple. (March 2008. My previous solution for
why this won't work was wrong. I said it would stop because the
catalyst wouldn't produce heat, but I said the catalyst was favoring
A+B->AB+heat, so the catalyst is releasing heat. Also, catalyzed
reactions exist that both absorb and release heat, google
"endothermic catalyst". Those catalyzed reactions that absorb energy
need to be supplied with energy, for example by radiant heat or by
some other reaction, or they'll stop.)
- Boiling point. Fill a piston with a
high-pressure gas at boiling point. Allow it to expand adiabatically
to low pressure. The temperature of the gas can't drop (it's at its
boiling point), so it condenses into a liquid or solid. Which takes
up much less volume. Compress the piston again (pretty easy; only the
noncondensed gas needs to be compressed now). Allow the gas to heat
up again and vaporize. Repeat. This converts ambient heat into
useful work. (Solution - boiling point varies with pressure. The
gradient of the pressure / temperature curve for the boiling point is
the one that disallows this perpetual motion machine. A "Sterling
Engine" is a real engine that works on a similar principle.)
-
The two metal plates. Have two metal plates
next to each other in vacuum in a magnetic field, with an insulated
wire (running through a lightbulb) between them, both plates are
sitting on a great big insulator. Electrons naturally jump off both
plates, but because of the magnetic field, electrons from one plate
fall on the other, and ones from the other fall on the insulator. So
you have a potential difference which lights the lightbulb. (Solution
- think of the system as a whole. The insulator eventually wraps
around, so plate A gets as many electrons jumping from plate B as
plate B gets jumping from plate A.)
- The great red spot of Jupiter. A natural result of the Coriolis
effect on bodies of gas or liquid is that vortices in one direction
tend to split into smaller vortices, but vortices in the other
direction tend to merge into larger vortices. Spin a system.
Starting with microscopic vortices in both directions (heat), watch
macroscopic motions emerge. If the system is big enough, you get a
stable biggest vortex, for example the great red spot of Jupiter. Set
up windmills. (Solution - Jupiter's little vorticies come from heat
differentials due to sunlight and internal fusion. Without an extra
energy source you don't get little vorticies to start with.)
-
The elliptical mirror. Make a mirror which
is a whole ellipse. Consider a photon passing through one of the
focii. Because it is an ellipse, it will be reflected through the
other focus. Then through the first again, and so on. After about 5
passes, no matter what direction the photon started in, it is now
travelling along the major axis. Cut a tiny hole in the mirror at the
major axis, a big hole around the minor axis, and let the mirror align
light for you which you can use as a quasi laser beam. (Solution -
this only works for the light that goes exactly through the focii.
Car headlights work on a similar principle.)
- Apply a magnetic field. Take any
object, any object at all. Put it in a magnetic field. The electrons
and nucleii of some of the atoms will align themselves with the field,
flipping their spin (see torque on a circuit). This reduces entropy
in the atoms. Spin is conserved, so the object as a whole (or the
magnet) will start spinning. The random atomic spins have been
extracted into a macro motion. (Solution - the spin extracted this
way is small compared to the energy released by applying a magnetic
field.)
- Light and Weight. Consider a hollow
barbell. Put a heavy generator in one end. Coat the inside of the
other end with mirrors, and put a lightbulb in there run by the
generator. Put the barbell in space and run the generator. The
generator has mass, it is heavy, so it attracts the light. The light
has no mass so it does not attract the generator. But the light does
have momentum, and it bounces off the barbell on the side nearest the
generator. The barbell as a whole accelerates in the direction of the
generator. Momentum is not conserved. (Solution - gravity is a
function of relativistic mass, not rest mass. Relativistic mass is
mrest/sqrt(1-v2/c2). For light, with
zero rest mass, recall e=mc2. The m in that formula is
relativistic mass.)
- Blackbody absorption and radiation in a
sparse gas in a container. I haven't designed a perpetual motion
machine based on this, but it's something I clearly don't understand.
Most collisions will be with the container walls rather than between
gas particles. Radiation primarily happens during collisions.
Absoprtion by gas particles happens whenever radiation hits it, which
will be mostly not during collisions. If you reverse time you'd
get radiation mostly during free flight and absoprtion mostly during
collisions, so this steady state isn't time symmetric.
Sorry, I can't review any more perpetual motion machines. It proved
to be too great a time sink. At the moment I don't even have time to
implement the things I know would work and be useful.
Unrelated pages on this site: