Also see:
My high school chemistry teacher told us there are three laws of thermodynamics: you can't get something for nothing, you can't win, and you have to lose. The first law says you can't produce matter or energy from nothing; they are conserved. The second says the amount of entropy in the universe can only increase. The third notes that friction exists, so entropy does increase. (Note from 20 years later: that's not what the third law says at all.)
Perpetual motion machines are machines that are supposed to disobey one of the laws of thermodynamics. Usually it's the second law that people want to break, reversing the flow of entropy. Entropy is the amount of disorder in the universe. (Some claim to violate the first law, they create energy from nothing. I don't consider those here.)
The second law of thermodynamics isn't actually an axiom. It can be
deduced from the other laws of physics. It's an application of the
pigeonhole principle.
I saw a published proof of the second law once that was based on quantum mechanics. Instead of arguing about n states, it represented the set of possible states as a volume in 6-dimensional space (3 for space, 3 for velocity), and showed that the volume stayed constant over time. (Um, it seems to me like that published proof covers the continuous space, while my outline of a proof was more quantum, but what do I know.)
This still allows perpetual motion machines to be built -- just not designed. If you succeed in building one you're guaranteed to be unable to explain it using the known laws of physics.
But wait. Anyone using a perpetual motion machine would want to do something with the work after it's been extracted from heat. If you consider such a system as a whole, work maps to heat maps to work. The number of possible states does not decrease.
This suggests it is possible to make a machine that continually does useful work without requiring outside energy. The key is to always know what state you are in, and to make sure useful states always map to useful states. An example of such a machine is a quantum computer.
The universe is a closed system, and entropy keeps increasing, so it will eventually reach maximum entropy and stay there, right? Wrong. It's a continuously expanding system, and the maximum entropy possible keeps increasing as the volume of the universe increases. The universe will never reach maximum entropy because the goalposts keep moving. Wheee! It's why the night sky is dark. This means the universe won't wind down to a constant nonzero temperature, but will continuously approach absolute zero instead. This strikes me as an improvement over heat death, but not much of one.
Usually a perpetual motion machine can be used to light a lightbulb. Put it in a closed system that continuously lights a lightbulb. The machine has to convert the heat and light generated into electricity to continue running the lightbulb.
Usually there is a second machine that looks just like the first machine running in reverse. Usually you get it by stopping all the particles and sending them in reverse. And usually this second machine should be a perpetual motion machine for the same reasons as the first machine.
This second machine is a perpetual motion machine, but for a very strange reason. The lightbulb continuously absorbs heat and light, converting it into electricity. And (here's the important part), the machine keeps converting electricity into heat and light. Is that what is supposed to happen? No? Well, figure out how it is happening and you've figured out why the original perpetual motion machine won't work.
Why won't these work? (I'm including the solutions. Tell me if you don't want to see the solutions. I think the solutions are more interesting than the designs themselves.)
Catalyzing an endothermic chemical reation.
Suppose you have a reaction AB+heat <-> A+B which favors A+B.
Such reactions do exist -- for example salt dissolving in water. Find
a catalyst for this reaction. It reduces entropy, so the catalyst
favors AB+heat. When AB+heat is released out
into solution, it decays back into A+B, absorbing heat. You've got
heat released at the catalyst and absorbed in the rest of the
solution. Run a thermocouple. (March 2008. My previous solution for
why this won't work was wrong. I said it would stop because the
catalyst wouldn't produce heat, but I said the catalyst was favoring
A+B->AB+heat, so the catalyst is releasing heat. Also, catalyzed
reactions exist that both absorb and release heat, google
"endothermic catalyst". Those catalyzed reactions that absorb energy
need to be supplied with energy, for example by radiant heat or by
some other reaction, or they'll stop.)
The two metal plates. Have two metal plates
next to each other in vacuum in a magnetic field, with an insulated
wire (running through a lightbulb) between them, both plates are
sitting on a great big insulator. Electrons naturally jump off both
plates, but because of the magnetic field, electrons from one plate
fall on the other, and ones from the other fall on the insulator. So
you have a potential difference which lights the lightbulb. (Solution
- think of the system as a whole. The insulator eventually wraps
around, so plate A gets as many electrons jumping from plate B as
plate B gets jumping from plate A.)
The elliptical mirror. Make a mirror which
is a whole ellipse. Consider a photon passing through one of the
focii. Because it is an ellipse, it will be reflected through the
other focus. Then through the first again, and so on. After about 5
passes, no matter what direction the photon started in, it is now
travelling along the major axis. Cut a tiny hole in the mirror at the
major axis, a big hole around the minor axis, and let the mirror align
light for you which you can use as a quasi laser beam. (Solution -
this only works for the light that goes exactly through the focii.
Car headlights work on a similar principle.)
Unrelated pages on this site: